Charters are public schools and the vast majority, like district publics, are NOT for profit. I support charters that are NOT for profit. Just as there are good and not so good district public schools, the same holds true for public charters. Hence, I view public charters the same way I view public district schools. I believe that families have an obligation to seek the best educational programs and fit for them and this means having access to all schools within their reach.
Charter schools were established as a way to incubate new ideas and spark innovation in schools as well as to heighten competition so that all schools could continuously improve. Charters also offer choice to families who are looking for different and personalized ways to meet the needs of their children. Choices that don’t require home schooling or private schools.
Unlike some, I don’t believe that public charters are taking money away from public district schools. Instead, I view that as a declining enrollment issue. One that must be examined by those experiencing declining enrollment to determine reasons why. For any school to exist today, it must meet the ever changing needs of students and stay current with the changing educational platforms and practices or it will cease to exist and this goes for public district and charter schools alike.
Today there are a plethora of web-based educational programs for high schoolers. Many program offer complete courses with exceptional instructional delivery. Examples of full course web-based instructional programs include those from the popular Khan Academy. Khan can be downloaded to every smart device for free and has a suite of full online courses including AP courses. Another is the University of California online courses, known as U C Scout. These have to be used with a teacher either on site or through the UC system. Then there are a host of support programs that schools can use to support the personal learning needs of each student including Achieve3000, Desmos, Pear Deck, Vocabulary, NoRedInk, IXL, Quizlet, FlipChart, Duolingo, and on and on. Because just about every child has a smart phone or laptop the district is in a position to leverage technology to the max and personalize student learning. Purchasing devices for those that don’t have them should fall under the proper and intended use of the districts Local Control Funding Formula and Local Control Accountability Plan, so everyone should be covered.
This requires a paradigm shift on the part of all public school systems, using time and space differently and transitioning teachers from dispensers of knowledge to facilitators of the same.. The time for personalizing learning, providing opportunities for children to have a balanced learning experience bringing back cooking classes, sewing, woodshop, music, arts and crafts is also now in this new space. Parents ultimately will decide which schools and which educational systems survive; hence we must all listen to our constituents and understand the shift that technology requires.